English

FEATURES

2011 ãîä

January 2011 – No 1

February 2011 – No 2

March 2011 – No 3

April 2011 – No 4

May 2011 – No 5

June 2011 – No 6

July 2011 - No 7

August 2011 – No 8

Septembe 2011 – No 9

Octobe 2011 – No 10

November 2011 – No 11

December 2011 – No 12


2010 ãîä

January 2010 – No 1

February 2010 – No 2

March 2010 – No 3

April 2010 – No 4

May 2010 – No 5

June 2010 – No 6

July 2010 – No 7

August 2010 – No 8

Septembe 2010 – No 9

Octobe 2010 – No 10

November 2010 – No 11

December 2010 – No 12


2009 ãîä

January 2009 – No 1

February 2009 – No 2

March 2009 – No 3

April 2009 – No 4

May 2009 – No 5

June 2009 – No 6

July 2009 – No 7

August 2009 – No 8

Septembe 2009 – No 9

Octobe 2009 – No 10

November 2009 – No 11

December 2009 – No 12


2008 ãîä

January 2008 – No 1

February 2008 – No 2

March 2008 – No 3

April 2008 – No 4

June 2008 – No 6

July 2008 – No 7

August 2008 – No 8

September 2008 – No 9

October 2008 – No 10

November 2008 – No 11

December 2008 – No 12


The point of view


INTELLECT AND SURVIVAL STARTEGIES (SINGULAR PHILOSOPHY)

SOCIOGENETICS: LETTING GO OF DELUSION

THE TRUTH OF LIFE AND LIFE FOR TRUTH’S SAKE

LET’S FACE THE TRUTH

THE “ETHICOSPHERE” IS A ROAD MAP TOWARDS MAN’S HAPPINESS

Philosophy in via to science

PHILOSOPHY IN PROJECT “GLOBALIZATION”

Contest of Philosophy Projects

THE IDEOLOGY OF WISDOM IS A POLITICAL FACTOR!


The point of view


THE GLOBALISATION OF ETHICS: PRACTICE OF HUMANISM

THE MAN AND HIS SOCIAL FORM OF LIFE

The philosophical aspect of the crisis

A STEP TOWARDS JUSTICE

THE CENTRAL QUESTION AND THE ANSWER OF PHILOSOPHY

HUMANENESS IS A RESOURCE OF CIVILISATION


The point of view


Nobel Prize Winner Academician Vitaly Ginzburg:

‘…And you, my friends, no matter your positions, Will never be musicians!’

Civil society:  A phantom or reality?

The autonomy of right

Another rush for power, or a search for national ideology?

Humanism and Moral Perfection

We say ‘no’ to ersatz

A Blind Game of Blind Forces

Rethinking societal politics

ADMITTANCE DENIED

THE PHILOSOPHY OF DIGNIFIED LIFE – A NEW SOCIAL TREND


The point of view


SOCIAL IDEA AND SCIENTIFIC APPROACH

THE PHILOSOPHICAL PROJECT OF SOCIAL POLITICS

Elections as the Mirror of Democracy

THE PHILOSOPHY OF DIGNIFIED LIFE – A NEW SOCIAL TREND

New Year’s Philosophical Greetings

Philosophy and Everyday Life

The State and Philosophy: They Click!

Ethics: Scientific knowledge, rationale and normativity

English


THE RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHICAL GAZETTE


September 2009 – No 9

 


FEATURES


Gottfried Leibnitz, “We Live in the Best of Possible Worlds.”

 

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716) was a German philosopher, polymath and mathematician. When he was baptized, he looked into the world his eyes wide open and it was then that his father gave him the name of Gottfried, which stands for German “god” and “world”. He thought that his child was destined for great deeds. The boy did live up to his father’s expectations.   

Leibniz occupies a grand place in both the history of philosophy and the history of mathematics. He invented infinitesimal calculus independently of Newton, and his notation has been in general use since then. He also invented the binary system, foundation of virtually all modern computer architectures. In philosophy, he is mostly remembered for optimism, i.e. his conclusion that our universe is, in a restricted sense, the best possible one God could have made. He was, along with Rene Descartes and Baruch Spinoza, one of the three greatest 17th-century rationalists and contributors to modern logic and analysis, but his philosophy also looks back to the scholastic tradition, in which logic was an important part. Leibniz also made major contributions to physics and technology, and anticipated notions that surfaced much later in biology, medicine, geology, probability theory, psychology, linguistics, and information science. He also wrote on politics, law, ethics, theology, history, philosophy and philology, even occasional verse.

 

BY NATALYA LOGINOVA

Read the article in Russian

 

Humaneness is a Resource of Civilization

 

 

Humaneness is intertwined with morality: “to act humanely” means to do something good, something moral. But hardly can we find a politician who would not say that everything he does is in the name of humaneness, his actions often being far from good morals. Such a mismatch cannot have been left without a philosophical scrutiny then, nor has it lost its topicality today. So, can one be humane without being wise?

By rejecting wisdom as a criterion for screening individuals as candidates for government, we are turning into a society of suicides. As a first step to build a true civilization, we are to understand the entirely new value of its basis because such an understanding will serve a platform for laying down absolutely new conditions of life on Earth. Wisdom in social government is thus a creative tool of state and society for attaining a decent life for each and everyone. This is not something we should dream of. This is what we should fight for: In truth there is the strength.

 

 

BY ARNOLD KAZMIN

Read the article in Russian

English

 

Youth Policy: An Obscure Outline So Far

 

The problem is as old as the hills. It was coined as far back as thousands of years ago by the King of Shumer Hammurabi IV. This is true, but with a reservation that it might first have been raised even earlier by someone else.

President Medvedev has declared 2009 to be the Year of the Youth. It is good that there is an all-out awareness of the increasing responsibility over the future of our youth. What we do not have today is a workable action plan to turn around the present situation. The public concern is all the more so acute if we look at the youth problem against the present-day demographics.

This article gives a comprehensive account of how this problem is being solved in the developed West: Germany, Canada, Sweden and Britain.

 

 

BY EVGENI POLUEKTOV

  Read the article in Russian

 

Innovation: Tears and Applause

 

What is the role of academic science in innovation? The answer to this question and many others are given by the Vice-president of the Russian Academy of Sciences Sergei Aldoshin.

The interview covers a wide range of problems such as why with increasing funding the payback or the contribution of the RAS to the country’s economy is insignificant, what barriers do not allow the RAS to get on the track of innovation, why it is still difficult to implement scientific achievements and discoveries and many others.

The material seems also to be interesting because it is focused on the present-day bottlenecks in Russian science and gives a reader an objective picture of the general situation with science in the country.

INTERVIEW BY SERGEI SHARAKSHANE

Read the article in Russian

 

Will Common Sense Win?

 

September 1 is when the school year starts in Russia. But this time it is going to be special because of the ongoing serious reform in education. RPhG has always paid great attention to education and problems associated with it because this field is generally perceived to be one of the key areas of our social life. Ancient Greeks however were the first to understand the importance of education and it is noteworthy that they placed teaching at the top of their list of their governments’ all-time priorities followed by healing and defending.

The article gives insights into what innovations have been made recently in the education system, whether they have been effective and, if they have, to what measure.

BY ANTON SMIRNOV

Read the article in Russian

 

 

Religion as a School Subject? – A Big Mistake!

 

In accordance with the decision of the Russian President, Orthodoxy, Catholicism, Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism and so on will be taught as a compulsory secondary school subject, effective September 1. Parents will have to choose for their children between Elements of World Religions and Secular Ethics. It is very appropriate to mention though that before that decision school had been separated from church by the 1918 Soviet Decree and also – by the current Constitution of the Russian Federation.

Yet, there are many people who believe that such ‘innovation’ may do more harm than good and think that implanting religion into school curriculum is a big mistake.

BY SERGEI SHARAKSHANE

Read the article in Russian